rss feed
Subscribe
to RSS feed

email
Subscribe
to mailing list

23rd October 2006

Blue and Red Clementine - Relative Tone Exercise

21st October 2006

Blue Clementine

click for enlargement

Oil on Panel 7" X 5"


21st October 2006

Red Clementine

click for enlargement

Oil on Panel 7" X 5"

Attentive visitors will note that this is a repeat of the blue and red tonal exercise I did last weekend with my Adonis cast.

This version of the exercise is slightly more complicated, because this time I have strong local colour to deal with on the clementine. The Adonis cast was already monochrome, so much of the work was done for me. That said, I only really have one bright colour here, the green of the leaves being quite dull, so its really only a small step on. I plan to do one more of these exercises, with a range of strong colours in the subject, then I'll settle into a series of raw umber/white monochrome still lifes.

Another difference with this one is the inclusion of heavy chiaroscuro. I thought that this would stretch the red version a bit. Also I did both of these the same day, spending about three or four hours on each one. I have to say it was a bit of a push to get them both done, I had to use every bit of available daylight now that the nights are drawing in, but it kept me from getting tied up in details in helped to keep the paint fresher.

As far as technique is concerned, I followed exactly the same approach as I did with the last two, the technique Harold Speed recommends in his elementary tone exercise. This is basically a direct painting technique, using a simple medium of turps and linseed oil, which I used again on these two. I like the medium. It gives the paint a nice, flowing consistency, but I suspect that its at its most useful mixed into the paint for this kind of work. I cant imagine it being especially useful for glazing or all that fancy layered stuff.

I'm going to stick with direct painting like this for a little while. I very much want to try out other methods, under painting, grisaille, glazing, etc, but my handling of paint is still at a very basic level, and I feel that I'll get more out of those techniques once I've become more confident and more deft with a brush. Painting is very different from drawing in that respect. Gradually, I'm getting to know what can be done with a brush, the various ways that paint can be applied, just enough to give me the idea that there's a lot for me to learn here with a simpler direct painting technique before I start trying out all kinds of exotic mediums.

Conclusions

The conclusions I've drawn from this exercise are similar to those I came to after the Adonis paintings. Again, I'm amazed at the fact that the red version is as convincing a translation of light and form as the blue one. Again, I like the red one more.

I was thinking after the red and blue Adonis paintings that the red was stronger because of the intensity of the colour, because the intensity in some way made up for the reduced tonal range. I've refined that view somewhat with this one. I now think that its partly because of the warm/cool dynamic it sets up. As more white is mixed with the cadmium red, it becomes gradually cooler, until you reach completely cool in the pure white highlights. This sets up a logic of warm, dark shadows and cool lights. Its something like the way a baroque picture would be painted, with warm browns for the shadow areas and cool lights, except of course that in a baroque painting, (I'm thinking of Rembrandt, Rubens etc here), the shadows would be translucent and the lights thick and opaque, giving another added dynamic between the lights and darks.

I think that the warm/cool dynamic is partly what makes the deep shadows still work on the red painting. Its a secondary point, nonetheless an interesting one. This exercise today has got me thinking more clearly about these three dynamics - light/dark, warm/cool, translucent/opaque - and how they can be used in a picture. I think that the key to all of them lies in the consistency of their application within the picture. Once the logic is set up, unless its followed consistently throughout the picture, the strength of the illusion will be weakened. I plan to investigate this further in the coming series of monochromes, together with more practice with paint handling and edges.

To start with, I'll just be dealing with warm/cool and light/dark I think, so as not to complicate matters too much. I think it helps to reduce the amount of things you're dealing with at one time when you're learning. I'm pretty sure it hastens progression, too.

A case in point of this is the painting I did the day after these two, the same subject in colour, Clementine and Bottle. Really, it was a bit naughty of me to be doing a full colour study right now, when I'm concentrating on value studies. But I just couldn't resist it. What's noticeable about that third version, to me at least, is that I haven't done as good a job with the relative values as I did with these two. Having colour in the picture gave me a slew of other things to deal with, with the result that I took my eye off the ball somewhat with the tones, and made a few mistakes. I enjoyed the painting, and I think it came out quite well, but I'll be back to monochromes for the next few. Once I've got some more practice in with monochrome painting, and my ability to relate tones in a painting has improved, I'll deal with colour again. Hopefully, by that time I'll be making less mistakes with the tones.

Archived Posts